TSC's Teacher Performance Appraisal and Development (TPAD) system was designed to drive genuine professional growth, but in many Kenyan schools it has become a compliance exercise — forms completed to satisfy the requirement, filed away, and largely disconnected from what actually happens in classrooms day to day. Principals who use TPAD as intended, rather than as a paperwork obligation, get considerably more value from the process.
Why TPAD often fails to achieve its purpose
The most common failure mode is treating TPAD as an annual event rather than a continuous process. A teacher who completes a self-appraisal, has a single meeting with the principal near the end of the appraisal period, and receives a rating has gone through the motions without the ongoing feedback loop that actually drives improvement.
Making TPAD a genuine development tool
Set specific, discussed targets at the start of the period
TPAD targets that are generic ("improve teaching quality") give teachers little concrete direction. Targets developed collaboratively between the teacher and their appraiser — specific, achievable, and directly tied to something the teacher can act on, such as improving assessment feedback practices or strengthening a specific pedagogical technique — give the process real substance.
Build in genuine mid-period check-ins
A brief, informal check-in partway through the appraisal period — not a full formal review, just a conversation about progress against the agreed targets — keeps TPAD alive as an ongoing process rather than a once-a-year event. This also means the final appraisal contains no surprises, because progress has been discussed along the way.
Practical shift: Instead of the appraiser filling in TPAD forms based on general impressions, base the appraisal conversation on specific evidence — a lesson observation, a review of assessment data for the teacher's classes, attendance records, and TPAD self-appraisal — so the conversation is grounded in facts both parties can discuss concretely.
Connect TPAD to actual support, not just evaluation
An appraisal that identifies a development need but provides no pathway to address it — no training, no mentoring, no resources — is an evaluation without development. Where TPAD identifies a genuine area for growth, principals who connect that finding to a specific support action (a professional development session, pairing with a stronger colleague, access to a specific resource) get considerably more improvement from the process than those who simply record the finding and move on.
Use TPAD data in aggregate, not just individually
Beyond individual teacher development, TPAD data reviewed in aggregate across the whole staff can reveal school-wide patterns — a common area where multiple teachers need support, a strength the school could build on more deliberately. This aggregate view is often overlooked when TPAD is treated purely as an individual, private process between teacher and appraiser.
Balance accountability with genuine support
TPAD does carry accountability implications, and principals should not shy away from that reality — persistent underperformance needs to be addressed. But a TPAD process experienced by teachers as purely punitive, with no genuine developmental support, breeds resentment and defensive box-ticking rather than honest self-reflection. The most effective principals hold both accountability and support in balance, communicating clearly that the goal is growth, not just measurement.
Ground your staff conversations in real classroom data.
Edupath SMS gives you instant access to teacher attendance, class results trends, and curriculum coverage — the evidence that makes TPAD conversations genuinely useful. Free to start.
Create Free Account